JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Three sisters Saira @ Renu (16 years), P.W. 1, Sahanaz @
Benu (14 years), P.W. 2 and Salma @ Minu (13 years), P.W. 3 left their residence
in the morning of 15.07.1998 for their respective schools. When Sahanaz (P.W. 2)
and Salma (P.W. 3) left their residence around 10.30 a.m. they found their uncle
Sher Ali Sardar @ Rajesh having an altercation with their mother over money.
Their uncle for the last couple of months had been misbehaving with their
mother and had even tried to throttle her over monetary demands out of the
monies sent to the family by their father Raju Sardar, P.W. 10, from Japan
wherein he was residing. Little did they know that they were seeing their mother
for the last time. Sahanaz's class was given an early holiday as one of her
classmate had died. When she prematurely returned from school she found that
their room was under lock and key. She felt that her mother had gone to bring
Saira from school, as usual, and waited for her in a neighbour's house. Around
2.00 p.m. her uncle, the appellant herein, returned and opened the padlock of
the room. Saira, the elder sister, also returned from school in the meantime.
Strangely their mother had not gone to bring Saira back and when the sisters
enquired about the whereabouts of their mother, the appellant showed them a
letter written in Urdu by their mother. The sisters took the letter to a neighbour
and the latter read out the letter to them which stated that their mother had left
them. The sisters were surprised since their mother ordinarily did not go outside
and that she was not conversant with Urdu. When they went back to their room
and to their utter surprise they found that footwear of their mother, i.e. two pair
of Chappals were inside the room and the rice set on the fire for boiling was
burnt. These signs made sisters suspect that their mother had not voluntarily left
the house. Such suspicion was further strengthened by the information they
received from the neighbourhood that the appellant was seen going in a rickshaw
with a bag in the afternoon on that day. They found that a bag was missing from
their room. When they enquired of their uncle as to such facts he became
perplexed and was unable to explain the same.
(2.) These circumstances gave rise to a strong suspicion in the mind of the two
sisters that their mother had been killed by their uncle and her body was
removed in the said bag in order to hush up the crime. With the assistance of the
neighbours, particularly, Urusha Begum, P.W. 14 Saira @ Renu, P.W. 1, reported
the incident at Watgunge police station whereupon, P.W. 29, the Investigating
Officer of the instant case, reduced her complaint into writing and registered
Watgunge police station Case No. 153 dated 15.07.1998 under Section 302 I P C
against the appellant for investigation.
(3.) Soon thereafter P.W. 29 went to the place of occurrence, and arrested the
appellant and brought him to the police station for interrogation. In the course of
investigation, the appellant led the investigating agency to a place situated in
front of premises no. 3A, Gariahat Road, Kolkata 700 019 where he claimed to
have dumped the body. The local people around the place informed that a female
dead body had been recovered and was removed by the police personnel attached
to Gariahat police station. Thereafter P.W. 1 and 2 along with appellant were
taken Gariahat police station. P. W 1 and 2 identified the bag and other articles
including the ornaments of their mother and the shirt and lungi of the appellant,
and, later on, identified the dead body at the morgue as that of their mother.
Post-mortem revealed that the said victim had suffered, inter alia, head injury
from a hard blunt substance. The serological report also confirmed that the blood
was found in the bag and the other articles like ploy sheet, rope, gunny bags,
bed-sheet, shirt and lungi which were found inside the said bag. Investigation
further revealed that the appellant with the assistance of Abdul Samad,
P.W 4, the local rickshaw puller had removed a heavy bag from the premises around 12
noon and the rickshaw puller had taken the appellant with the bag in front of
Kwality ice cream factory at Diamond Harbour Road wherefrom the appellant had
boarded a taxi along with the said bag. P.W. 11 Mehmud Azaz, a neighbour, who
was purchasing meat in the locality had also seen the appellant in the rickshaw
with a bag. It is further the prosecution case that one Sumita Lal, P. W. 5 and
her mother-in-law, P.W. 6, who were Jhupri (shack) dwellers on the pavement
near Telephone Exchange Office at Ballygunge Phari had seen the appellant
alighting from the taxi and putting the said bag under a tree and the latter asked
P.W. 5 to keep watch over the said bag. Since the appellant did not return upto 4
p.m., P.W. 5 informed the matter to the local police station i.e. Gariahat Police
Station whereupon the police officers attached to Gariahat Police Station being
P.W. 23, and 27 seized the said bag and recovered the dead body of the victim
therefrom along with other incriminating articles. During investigation, P.W. 4, 5
and 6, identified the appellant in the test of identification parade.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.