JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) PLAINT CASE
Mita Datta Roy was married to Priti Gopal Dutta Roy. The marriage
was fixed through negotiation by common relation and/or friend that
was solemnized on December 8, 1994. Mita was originally from
Orissa where her parents were residing. Her father was a
businessman in Orissa. Her in-law s family was disciple of Thakur
Anukul Chandra. They were strictly vegetarian as claimed by Priti
Gopal. According to him, Mita came from a different culture and it
was difficult for her to adjust the culture, food habit of her in-laws
that gave rise to initial discord. At least on five occasions she
abruptly left her in-law's place and on each occasion her in-laws
persuaded her to come back. In 1997, she gave birth to her only
child. There was difference of opinion on the issue of daughter s
education.
(2.) Priti Gopal filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights being
Matrimonial Suit No.4 of 1998. Despite his best efforts, he could not
persuade Mita to come back to her in-law s place. Priti Gopal
withdrew the said suit and filed a suit for divorce being Matrimonial Suit No.85 of 2000 on the ground of cruelty and desertion. Again
there was rapprochement. Priti Gopal withdrew the second suit,
however, situation did not improve, that gave rise to filing of the third
suit for divorce being Matrimonial Suit No.12 of 2003 by Priti Gopal.
(3.) In the plaint, Priti Gopal alleged that Mita was paranoid. She caused
mental cruelty to Priti by making incorrect allegations alleging extra
marital affair Priti Gopal had with his colleague Sucheta Mallick and
his elder sister-in-law (brother s wife). He also alleged that Mita
widely spread scandal that caused immense damage to his character
resulting in mental cruelty. According to him, Mita went to his
workplace and created a scene by making wild and bold allegations
against Priti Gopal.
WRITTEN STATEMENT;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.