JUDGEMENT
R.Pal, J. -
(1.) The petitioner No. 1 is a registered dealer under the Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter, referred to as the 1956 Act) and under the Bengal Finance Sales Tax Act, 1941 (hereinafter referred to as 1941 Act).
(2.) The grievance of the petitioners is that the Sales Tax Authorities are refusing to issue declaration forms either under the 1956 Act or under the 1941 Act. It is stated that the ground for such refusal is the petitioners failure to pay the arrear Sales Tax dues. The petitioner No. 1, is, it is con tended, being deprived thereby of the concessional rates of tax available to registered dealers in contravention of section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
(3.) The petitioner No. 1 is admittedly liable to pay Sales Tax both under the 1956 Act and under the 1941 Act. In this case we are only concerned with the refusal of the Sales Tax authority to give declaration forms under Rule 4 of the 1956 Act to the petitioner No. 1. Inasmuch as the questions to be decided in this matter ultimately involves only a question of interpretation of statutory provisions the matter is being disposed of without affidavits.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.