DHIRENDRA NATH BOSE Vs. ADDITIONAL MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE
LAWS(CAL)-1971-4-2
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on April 27,1971

DHIRENDRA NATH BOSE Appellant
VERSUS
ADDITIONAL MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

P.K.Banerjee, J. - (1.) In this application the petitioner challenges the order made under Section 21(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, requiring the Board of Revenue to refer the question of law to the High Court. The Board of Revenue refused to refer the same to the High Court. It is argued that the order was passed without giving the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.
(2.) The only question, therefore, that arises in this case is whether in disposing of the matter under Section 21(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, the Member, Board of Revenue, is to hear the parties. We are, therefore, concerned whether under Section 21(1) the Board acts as a quasi-judicial body and must dispose of the application under Section 21(1) after hearing the parties. There cannot be any dispute that in disposing the matter coming under Section 20 of the Act, the Board must hear persons adversely affected by the order. If any party is affected by the order passed by the Board they have a right under Section 21(1) to apply to the Board, requiring the Board to refer to the High Court any question of law arising out of such order. In case of refusal to refer the matter to the High Court, the Board must record the reason for such refusal. An aggrieved party has a right under Section 21(2)(b) to apply to the High Court against such refusal. While disposing of the appeal or revisional application, the Board of Revenue acts as a quasi-judicial authority. Any party aggrieved by any order of the Board has a right to apply for review under Section 6(2) of the Board of Revenue Act, 1913.
(3.) If any person is aggrieved by the order under Section 20(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, under Section 21(1) of the Act, he may apply to the Board for reference to the High Court. In that case, the Board may either refer the same to the High Court or refuse to refer it. In case of refusal two contingencies may arise : the aggrieved party may withdraw the application for reference or apply to the High Court against the said refusal. It must be stated here that if the Board refuses to refer the matter, it must give reasons for such refusal.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.