JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS appeal is directed against an adjudication order made by A. N. Ray J. in insolvency jurisdiction. The petitioning creditor, who is the respondent before us, obtain ed a consent decree against the appellant Dharamchand Dhiman, d. C. Dhiman, and Brothers Private Limited and others in Suit No. 543 of 1. 961. Among the terms of consent decree, clauses (d)and (e) are of relevance to the appeal. They are :-
" (d) Premises No. 22 G. T. Road, lilooah, Howrah being the immovable property of the defendant No. 6 shall be charged by way of second charge in favour of the plaintiff for payment of the decretal amount and interest subject to paramount charge of Messrs. Mohta bros. (P) Ltd. (e) The machinery lying at premises no. 22 G. T. Road, Lilooah, Howrah being the properties of defendant No. 6 shall be charged in favour of the plaintiff by way of third charge for payment of the decretal amount and interest subject to the first charge of Messrs. United Bank of India Ltd. and second charge of Hariprokash Mohta "
(2.) IT may be stated at once that the defendant No. 6 is Steel Equipment and construction Private Ltd.
(3.) IT was contended before us, as it was contended before the learned trial judge, that the petitioning creditor is a secured creditor and, therefore, not having relinquished his security for the benefit of the creditors he is not entitled to an adjudication order having regard to bee. 12 of the Presidency Towns In solvency Act. The term 'secured creditor' is defined in section 2 (g) of the presidency Towns Insolvency Act as follows:-
"secured creditor includes a landlord who under any enactment for the time being in force has a charge on land for the rent of that land. ";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.