LALCHAND DHARAMCHAND Vs. ALLIANCE JUTE MILLS CO LTD
LAWS(CAL)-1971-11-2
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on November 10,1971

LALCHAND DHARAMCHAND Appellant
VERSUS
ALLIANCE JUTE MILLS CO. LTD. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.C.Ghose, J. - (1.) THIS application has been made under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act by the petitioner for the stay of the suit No. 448 of 1969 end all proceedings relating thereto and arising therefrom. The facts leading to the making of this application are stated hereunder.
(2.) BY exchange of a Bought Note and a corresponding sold note both bearing No. RJ-50521 dated March 16. 1968, through the broker R. L. Saraf and Co.. the petitioner sold to the respondent and the respondent bought from the petitioner 600 Maunds (equivalent to 22394 Kgs.) Agartala Mesta Fibre at the rate of Rs. 38.50 P. per Maund working out at Rs. 103.15 P. per quintal delivery on 31st March, 1968, at the buyers' mill siding. The detailed terms and conditions of the said transaction would appear from a copy of the Sold Note annexed as Annexure B to the petition filed herein. The said contract between the parties was subject to the terms and conditions of the East India Jute and Has-sian Exchange Association Ltd. relating to contracts for raw jute. All the terms and conditions of the transferable specific delivery contract for raw iute of the East India Jute and Hessian Exchange Association Ltd., Calcutta, were expressly made applicable to the said contract. The Arbitrator named in the said contract was Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
(3.) THE relevant, bye-law of the said Association containing the said arbitration clause contained in Rule 17 of Chapter IX applicable to the contract in the instant case provides as follows, to wit :-- "17. All matters, questions, disputes, differences and/or claims arising out of and/or concerning and/or in connection with and/or in consequence of or relating to this contract including matters relating to insurance and demurrage whether or not the obligations of either or both parties under this contract be subsisting at the time of such dispute and whether or not this contract has been terminated or purported to be terminated or completed shall be referred to the arbitration in accordance with the provisions for reference to arbitration contained in these bye-laws . . . . . ";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.