JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Case of the petitioner in this art.22 petition is this. Committing forgery the
ninth and tenth respondents (two of the private respondents) dealt with her immovable property.
The authorities did not give any attention to her repeated representations whereby she requested
them to make an investigation.
(2.) Counsel submits that this Court should make an order directing the
Additional District Sub-Registrar at Rajganj of the district Jalpaiguri to make an
investigation under s. 82 of the Registration Act, 1908.
(3.) Section 82 of the Registration Act, 1908 deals with the penalty for making false
statements, delivering false copies or translations, false personation, and abetment. Nothing in
the section empowers a registering officer to make an investigation for ascertaining whether one
presenting a document for registration has committed forgery. I am, therefore, unable to see how
a mandamus can be issued commanding the registering officer to make an investigation under
the section.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.