JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 19/07/2005 and
20/07/2005 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast
Track Court-II, Diamond Harbour, South 24 Parganas in Sessions Trial No. 40 (7)
04 arising out of Sessions Case No. 105 (1) 04 convicting the appellants
Kochiram Ghosh @ Kochi and Badal Ghosh for having committed offence under
Section 302 of I.P.C. and sentencing them to suffer imprisonment for life and fine
of Rs. 5000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for two years, they are
also found guilty for having committed offence under Section 201 I.P.C. and
sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for two years along with fine of Rs.
2500/-, in default, to suffer imprisonment for one year.
(2.) It is the a prosecution s case that the deceased Tapan Halder was dealing
in selling fish in Shasan Bazar. He got acquainted with the appellant Kochiram
Ghosh @ Kochi of Muldia Ghoshpara who used to work in the sweetmeat shop of
Shankar Mondal which was situated in front of the house of the defacto
complainant i.e. Swapan Halder, brother of deceased Tapan Halder. After the
appellant/accused Kochiram Ghosh left the sweetmeat shop of Shankar Mondal
he started working as a fishmonger with the deceased Tapan. According to the
prosecution, the deceased Tapan had lent a sizeable amount of money to
Kochiram Ghosh. On 21/09/2003 Kochiram Ghosh had agreed to repay a sum of
Rs. 3000/- out of the amount due to Tapan before Durga Puja and therefore,
Tapan had gone to Kochiram Ghosh to Ghoshpara at Muldia to realise the money
but on that day he came back in the evening as appellant/accused Kochiram
Ghosh asked him to come on the next day. Therefore on 22/09/2003 Tapan
Halder left the house in the morning for going to the house of Kochiram Ghosh
and did not return on the next day i.e. 23/09/2003. Thereafter
appellant/accused Kochiram Ghosh met the complainant Swapan Halder at
Shasan Station, so he asked him the whereabouts of his brother, Kochiram
Ghosh showed his ignorance, so, the complainant started searching for his
brother Tapan and on 26/09/2003 a missing report came to be lodged at
Baruipur Police Station which came to be recorded as G.D. No. 1965 (Exbt. 10).
It is on 27/09/2003 the defecto complainant went to Ghoshpara at Muldia in
search of his brother. He came to know that on 23/09/2003 dead body of an
unknown person was found lying in the marshy land of the western field and
that it was taken away by Police Officer of Mandir Bazar Police Station and that
the said unknown person whose dead body was taken away by the police was
actually seen by the villagers in the company of appellant/accused Kochiram
Ghosh and since then Kochiram Ghosh had not returned home. On receiving the
said information, the complainant along with his relatives and friends visited
Mandir Bazar P. S. They were taken to a morgue of medical college to see the
dead body of unknown person which they identified as that of Tapan Halder.
Thereafter the dead body of Tapan was cremated. Swapan Halder P.W.1 lodged
an F.I.R. (Exbt. 1) on 07/10/2003 at Mandir Bazar Police Station in which he
suspected that Kochiram Ghosh had killed his brother Tapan Halder when he
went to meet Kochiram Ghosh to Ghoshpara at Muldia in order to realise the
amount of money due to him and then dumped the dead body in the paddy field
and that many others were involved with him in this act. The complaint came to
be registered as FIR Case No. 72/03 dated 07/10/2003 against the
appellant/accused Kochiram Ghosh and others under Section 302, 2O1 and 34
of I.P.C.
(3.) In the course of investigation, police arrested the appellants/accused
Kochiram Ghosh and Badal Ghosh of Muldia Ghoshpara under P.S. Mandir
Bazar. At their instance one sabal made of iron and some coconut coir and blood
stained mud from the house of Badal Ghosh came to be seized, vide seizure list
dated 09/10/2003 (Exbt. 3). The inquest report (Exbt. 2) dated 23/09/2003
which came to be prepared vide U.D. Case No. 20 dated 23/09/2003 in respect
of a dead body of unknown male person and the post mortem report (Exbt. 7)
dated 26/09/2003 which was prepared by Dr. Laxmi Kanta Ghosh were collected
and came to be filed along with the charge sheet filed against the
appellants/accused as well as three others who came to be acquitted.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.