JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The moot question involved in this litigation is whether the Court is entitled
to allow the parties to settle a dispute resulted in a criminal proceeding in
respect of a cognizable offence and, if so, in what circumstance the precedents
on the issue differ from case to case, however the majority view is in favour of
the proposition.
(2.) Md. Rafique, the petitioner above named was the proprietor of M/s. Euro
International. Md. Akram, Md. Koya and Anwar were also part of the said
organization. The respondent no.2 V. Jayachandra lodged a complaint with
the Police on December 10, 2004 at Karaya Police Station, Kolkata as against
them. According to the said complaint, Jayachandra was associated with
M/s. Sky Link Tours & Travels, Vellore, Tamil Nadu. Rafique contacted him
and introduced himself as proprietor of M/s. Euro International. He had
contacts with Government of India to send three hundred persons of different
categories of job for Caspine Petroleum Project at Azarbijun and offered him
to be his main recruiting agent. After negotiations, Jayachandra paid a sum
of rupees ten lacs to Rafique at his Dubai office towards commission for
recruitment and a further sum of rupees twelve lacs at their Kolkata office.
Jayachandra, appointed two agents at Tamil Nadu and collected applications
from three hundred persons with initial payment. He deposited those
applications along with their PassPorts and requisite papers and sent those
documents to Kolkata. Rafique arranged for VISA in favour of those three
hundred persons which were later on turned as fake. Jayachandra contacted
Rafique when he expressed his inability to send people at Azarbijun due to
difficulty and promised to refund the money in due course. He issued
cheques which were dishonoured for non-payment. On being cheated,
Jayachandra made the complaint. He came to learn young persons all over
India had been cheated in the same manner in the year 2003 and the amount
covered by such cheating ran into crores. He alleged criminal conspiracy as
against Rafique.
(3.) Acting upon the said complaint the Police arrested Rafique and his
companions and charged them under Section 467/468/471/420 /120-B of
the Indian Penal Code. During the pendency of the said criminal case the
parties compromised. They entered into a Deed of Compromise dated March
10, 2010 whereby Rafique refunded a sum of rupees twenty two lacs in full
and final settlement of the claim of Jayachandra. By the said Deed of
Compromise Jayachandra agreed and undertook to withdraw his complaint
lodged in Karaya Police Station referred to above. He also agreed not to
oppose application for bail in connection with the said case.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.