MOBARAK SK ALIAS MOBARAK HOSSAIN Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
LAWS(CAL)-2011-1-20
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on January 20,2011

MOBARAK SK. @ MOBARAK HOSSAIN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The criminal appeal is directed against a judgement and order passed in a sessions trial by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Murshidabad convicting the appellants under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing each of them thereunder to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine with default clause. In the trial total 8 accused were charged but the Trial Court convicted these appellants and acquitted the rests three.
(2.) Briefly stated the prosecution case is as under :- On September 16, 1998 the victim Maniruddin Sk. is the uncle of P.W. 5 Imdadul Haque and he was a teacher of Rajarampur High School. On 16th September, 1998 in the afternoon while the victim was returning home from school the P.W. 5 Imdadul Haque was also returning from Pikepara village where he went for some personal work. Near Rajarampur High School Imdadul met the victim and thereafter they were returned home together. They were proceeding through Rajarampur Moram Road and as soon as they reached near the house of Biren Sarkar, these accused and others being armed with various deadly weapons surrounded them from all side and pounced upon Maniruddin. The accused Entaj Sk. first assaulted Maniruddin with an iron rod on his right hand and asked the others to finish him, when all the accused started assaulting him with the weapons in their hands and consequently victim suffered injuries all over his persons and fell down on the ground and died at once. Seeing this assault the witness Imdadul raised alarm and started running away from the place out of fear and being attracted by the alarm raised by him many villagers collected to the spot and the accused persons fled away. Then the incident was reported to the local police station by Imdadul Haque and a case against the present appellants and others was registered. The police upon receipt of the complaint registered a case under Sections 341/326/302/34 of the Indian Penal and after completion of investigation submitted charge-sheet under Sections 302/34 IPC against the present appellants and three others. Thereafter, the present appellants and three others were placed on trial before the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Murshidabad to answer charges under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
(3.) The prosecution during the trial to bring home charges against the present appellants examined as many as 13 witnesses. The P.W. 5 Imdadul Haque, P.W. 7 Ekramul Haque, P.W. 10 Azmul Sk., P.W. 11 Jokimuddin Sk. and P.W. 12 Nurul Sk. were examined as eyewitnesses to the occurrence. Both the P.W. 1 Habibur Rahaman and P.W. 2 Anisur Rahaman were examined as witnesses of seizure of offending weapon two knives. The P.W. 6 Enamul Haque, P.W. 8 Makbul Hossain and P.W. 9 Md. Sademan Ali were examined as the witnesses to the inquest. The P.W. 4 Dr. Indranath Chatterjee is the doctor who held the post mortem. The P.W. 3 is a constable who took the dead body for post mortem. The P.W. 13 Sankar Kumar Roy Chowdhury is the Investigation Officer of the case.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.