JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioners instituted a suit for eviction of
a monthly tenant under the provisions of the West Bengal
Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. Statutory notice under
Section 13 (6) of the said Act, which is sine qua non to the
institution of the suit for eviction, is stated to be defective
as the tenancy runs according to Bengali calendar month
whereas the statutory notice has been issued according to
the English calendar month. Precisely, for such formal
defect where the suit is likely to fail, the petitioner, by
filing an application, prayed for withdrawal of the suit
with liberty to institute afresh.
(2.) The trial Court, after being satisfied that the
suit would fail for want of valid statutory notice, allowed
withdrawal of the said suit with liberty to file afresh. The revisional Court, however, proceeded to
hold that dismissal should have been done on contest as
an application under Section 17 (2) of the West Bengal
Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 has been disposed of by the
trial Court.
(3.) Order 23 Rule 1 of the said Act provides that
the plaintiff, at any time after the institution of the suit,
may abandon his suit or part of his claim. Order 23 Rule
3 further provides for withdrawal of the suit upon
satisfaction of the Court that the suit must fail for reason
of some formal defect. Thus, withdrawal can be sought at
any stage after institution of the suit.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.