JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Considering the urgency, Mr Mukherjee appearing for the petitioners
has explained, I am of the view that it will be appropriate to permit the petitioners to
move this WP under art.226 dated December 21, 2011 as an unlisted motion. Hence I grant
leave.
(2.) It is to be noted that notice has been given to the Government Pleader, and that he
is present and contesting the matter.
(3.) Mr. Mukherjee has submitted that the WP can be entertained, if at all, only at the
instance of the second petitioner, because the first petitioner, not a person, cannot file a
WP under art.226. I think the request to permit the second petitioner to press the WP
should be accepted, and I accept it. The word petitioner used hereinafter shall mean the
second petitioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.