GREAT EASTERN ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED Vs. JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
LAWS(CAL)-2011-8-9
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on August 19,2011

GREAT EASTERN ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED Appellant
VERSUS
JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LIMITED Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The ambit of the authority of the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 again falls for consideration. The petitioner suggests that as to whether there is a concluded contract between the parties has to be assessed by the arbitral tribunal. The respondent insists that it is for the Chief Justice or his designate to decide whether there is a concluded contract between the parties since, without there being a binding agreement, the arbitration clause would not be operative.
(2.) There is little dispute as to the facts, but there is a serious conflict as to the legal effect of the admitted facts. The petitioner circulated bid documents to interested parties for procuring MDPE pipes. The bid documents were made out in five sections, including instructions to the bidder; general conditions of contract; and, special conditions of contract. In the instructions to the bidder, the contents of the bidding documents were specified. Clause 16 of the instructions stipulated that the bid would remain valid for acceptance for four months from the bid due date. Clause 41.1 of the instructions provided that prior to the expiration of the period of bid validity, the purchaser would notify the successful bidder in writing, by fax or e-mail to be confirmed in writing, that the bid has been accepted. The clause emphasised that the notification of award/Fax of Intent will constitute the formation of the Contract. Clause 1.2 of the general conditions specified that the contract would mean the purchase order/contract and all exhibits and documents referred to therein and all terms and conditions thereof together with any subsequent modifications thereto. Clause 30 of the general conditions spelt out the mechanism for resolution of disputes. The opening limb of Clause 30.4 is relevant in the context: 30.4 Arbitration All disputes, controversies, or claims between the parties (except in matters where the decision of the Engineer-in-Charge is deemed to be final and binding) which cannot be mutually resolved within a reasonable time shall be referred to Arbitration by a sole arbitrator.
(3.) The rest of the clause provided the procedure and other details pertaining to arbitration.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.