JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 27.7.2007
passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, 3rd
Fast Track Court
at Berhampore in Sessions Trial No. 865 of 2003 whereby the learned Judge
convicted the appellants for offences punishable under Section 302 read with
Section 34 IPC under Section 235(2) CrPC. Accused Faizuddin was not found
guilty of the charge under Section 302/34 IPC. Five convicts viz. i) Chatu Sk., ii)
Alahaque Sk., iii) Majibar Sk., iv) Sahajamal Sk. and v) Abu Kalam Sk. were
sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- I.D. to S.I. for one
month. Accused Faizuddin was, however, acquitted of the charge under Section
302/34 IPC.
(2.) The facts and circumstances emerging from the FIR may be
summarized as under:
One Hasina Bewa informed the local P.S. vide FIR No. 53 dated 6.9.97 inter
alia that a few months back the accused Chatu Sk. attempted to outrage the
modesty of her daughter-in-law Rajina Bibi, PW 6 wife of her son Rashid Sk.
since deceased. The accused Chatu Sk. was humiliated by the villagers for such
indecent behaviour. By way of retaliation on 6.9.97 at about 6.30 A.M. while
Rashid Sk. since deceased was taking tea with his bhairabhai , Hebal Sk., PW 2
in the tea stall of Doat Ali, PW 4 at Tematha, Shyamnagar, all the six FIR named
accused encircled Rashid Sk. Alahaque Sk. caught hold of Rashid s hair by his
left hand and hacked his neck with a hansua in his right hand. The victim
Rashid sustained severe bleeding injury and ran towards his house but on his
way, he collapsed on the road and died instantaneously. In response to hue and
cry of the witnesses including the informant the local people rushed to the spot
and came to know about the incident. The accused persons, however, managed
to escape from the P.O.
(3.) On the basis of the said FIR, Nowada P.S. Case No. 53/97 dated
6.9.97 under Section 302 IPC was started against all the six persons as named in
the FIR. The case was endorsed to S.I., S. Nandy for investigation. In course of
the investigation, the I.O. visited the P.O. and recorded the statement of eyewitnesses collected the postmortem report of the deceased and also recorded the
statement of the witnesses during investigation. On completion of investigation,
the I.O. submitted charge-sheet under Section 302/34 IPC against all the six
accused persons. All the accused were asked to answer the charge under Section
302/34 IPC which reads as under:
"That you, on or about the 6th
September, 1997 at
Shyamnagar Dargatalapara under P.S. Nowda, District
Murshidabad in furtherance of common intention of all did
commit murder by intentionally causing the death of Rosid Sk.
and thereby committed an offence punishable under
Section 302 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and
within my cognizance.
And I hereby direct that you be tried by the said Court on
the said charge.
Charge is read over and explained in Bengali language to
accused persons who pleaded not guilty and claimed to be
dictated."
Accordingly, all the accused stand trial.
;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.