JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This revisional application is directed against an order No. 2 dated
25.11.2011 passed by the learned District Judge, Alipore in Title Suit No.
1536 of 2011.
The present revisional application is at the instance of the
defendant/opposite party assailing and/or challenging the ex-parte adinterim order of injunction passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996.
(2.) The point which emerges for consideration is whether the revisional
application under Article 227 of the Constitution is maintainable when
there is an alternative efficacious remedy by way of a statutory appeal
under Section 37 of the said Act.
(3.) Before dealing with the aforesaid point, short facts are necessary to
be narrated. The plaintiff/opposite party filed an application under Section
9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act praying for an order of injunction
restraining the petitioner from invoking or encashing the Bank
Guarantees. The Trial Court passed an ex-parte ad-interim order of
injunction on the above terms for a limited period i.e. till 21.12.2011.
According to the petitioner the unconditional Bank Guarantee is valid
till 20.12.2011 and the trial court passed an interim order which is
operative till 21.12.2011 and as such the petitioner is precluded from
invoking the Bank Guarantee which is not permissible under the law.
Although the said point has been taken but this court invited the
submission from the respective Counsels relating to the exercise of the
powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India when the statute
provides for an appeal against such an order.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.