JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The State has preferred an appeal against acquittal of the respondents who
were prosecuted on a charge under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C.
for causing death of Ruplal Bauri and the respondents Nanda Bauri and Iswar
Bauri were charged for committing offence punishable under Section 324 read
with Section 34 of I.P.C. for voluntarily causing hurt to Jiban Bauri by sharp
cutting instruments like axe and the respondent Rajen Bauri for having
committed offence under Section 323 of I.P.C. for voluntarily causing hurt to
Nakul Bauri.
(2.) In nutshell the prosecution s case can be summed up as under. On
18/01/1984, Nakul Bauri was tending his buffalos while his two sons, namely,
Ruplal Bauri and Jiban Bauri were cutting earth in their land in order to make
the same suitable for cultivation. In the meantime, the respondents Nanda Bauri
and Iswar Bauri armed with axe and Rajen armed with lathi came to that place
and challenged Ruplal Bauri and Jiban Bauri for cutting the land, over which
they had an altercation, the respondent/accused Iswar Bauri assaulted Ruplal
on his head with an axe causing severe injuries, due to which he fell down and
the respondent/accused Nanda Bauri assaulted Jiban Bauri with axe. On seeing
the incident, Nakul Bauri rushed to the place of occurrence where he was
assaulted by Rajen with lathi. Nakul raised alarm which attracted villagers.
Seeing this, the respondents/accused fled away. Ruplal Bauri and Jiban Bauri
were taken to Kustaur Hospital. Ruplal Bauri s injuries being serious his case
was referred to Purulia Hospital where he succumbed to his injury on the
following day. On the day of incident, F.I.R. came to be lodged by Nakul Bauri
against the respondents Iswar Bauri, Nanda Bauri and Rajen Bauri. Initially
offences under Sections 326, 324 and 323 read with Section 34 I.P.C. came to be
registered. On the death of Ruplal Bauri, additional offence under Section 302
read with Section 34 I.P.C. was registered.
(3.) On completion of the investigation, charge-sheet came to be filed against
the respondents who were tried on a charge for having committed offence under
Section 302 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. and Section 324 read with Section 34
of I.P.C. Accused Rajen was further charged for having committed offence under
Section 323 I.P.C. The respondents pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.