JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These two applications are at the instance
of the two applicants against the Order No.323 dated March 18,
2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 9
th Court, Alipore in Title Execution Case No.15 of 1982 thereby
rejecting two applications filed by the two applicants.
(2.) The C.O. No.1692 of 2006 has been filed by Mr. Amarnath
Shroff against the order of rejection of the prayer for leave to
sue against the judgment debtors and the learned Receiver
appointed by the learned Executing Court in Title Execution Case
No.15 of 1982 and the C.O. No.2354 of 2006 has been filed against
the order of rejection of the prayer for assignment of a decree in
favour of the applicant, M/s. Devine Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd.
(3.) Instead of narrating the entire facts leading to the filing
of the two applications, it will be convenient to state the facts
not in dispute first and then to state other facts.
The following facts are in dispute:-
a) The plaintiff-Bank / decree-holder / opposite party no.1 herein
instituted a suit being Title Suit No.1942 of 1976 for recovery
of money advanced under the heading 'Credit Facility' to M/s.
Sur & Company against the defendants / judgment debtors /
opposite parties herein.
b) The suit was decreed in final form on compromise in July 1981.
The plaintiff-Bank got a decree for recovery of Rs.8,60,696.86
with interest @ 16% per annuam from the date of institution of
the suit along with other reliefs.
c) The plaintiff-Bank filed a title execution case being Title
Execution Case No.15 of 1982 for realisation of the decretal
dues against the judgment debtors / opposite parties herein.
d) The judgment debtors took several adjournments to make
payments, but, ultimately did not make any payment and as such,
the Executing Court was about to sell the premises no.47,
Cristopher Road, Kolkata-700046 by auction (one of the four
mortgaged premises of the judgment debtors on consent).
e) A Receiver was appointed by the learned Executing Court over
the mortgaged properties of the judgment debtors.
f) Mr. Amarnath Shroff (applicant of the C.O.1692 of 2006) entered
into a Memorandum of Understanding (henceforth in short "MoU")
dated September 6, 2004 with some of the judgment debtors to
the effect, inter alia, that the mortgaged premises no.s 41,
43, 45 & 47, Cristopher Road, Kolkata-700046 would be sold to
Mr. Amarnath Shroff for consideration of Rs.5.8 crores and that
out of the sale proceeds Rs.45 lakhs would be paid to the
decree-holder for liquidation. Mr. Shroff also undertook the
responsibility to make payment to the Ex-workers and also to
pay their terminal benefits to the tune of Rs.25 lakhs and 10
lakhs. The parties to the agreement agreed to co-operate with
Mr. Shroff by signing papers which might be lawfully required
for the abovementioned purpose.
g) M/s. Devine Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd. (applicant of the C.O.
No.2354 of 2006) of which Mr. Amarnath Shroff is a Director
wrote a letter dated January 1, 2005 to the decree-holder
praying for assignment of the decree in its favour upon payment
of the decretal dues.
h) Mr. Amarnath Shroff filed an application dated March 7, 2005
before the learned Executing Court, Alipore praying for, inter
alia, to allow him to file a suit for specific performance of
agreement dated September 6, 2004.
i) M/s. Devine Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd. also filed an application
praying for assignment of the decree in its favour and
discharge of the Receiver in March 2005.
j) By the letter dated March 18, 2005, the plaintiff-bank /
decree-holder expressed its willingness to assign the decree in
favour of M/s. Devine Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd. and to deliver the
title deeds of the property to the company on payment of entire
dues.
k) Upon hearing both the sides and on consideration of the
applications and their objections and the reply, the learned
Executing Court rejected both the applications filed by the Mr.
Amarnath Shroff and M/s. Devine Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd. by the
impugned order dated March 18, 2006. Being aggrieved, the two
applicants have preferred the two revisional applications.
l) Shree Ganga Construction Company Ltd. (of which Mr. Amarnath is
a Director) deposited a sum of Rs.61 lakhs as fixed deposit
with the plaintiff-Bank to show bona fide attitude of
purchasing the premises in suit in 2005.
m) On February 14, 2007, a sum of Rs.70 lakhs was deposited with
the Allahabad Bank by way of a fixed deposit in the name of
Christopher Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd., and
n) On August 25, 2010, an affidavit was filed by Ranjit Sur and
Sanjit Sur thereby denying that any MoU had been executed
between them and Mr. Shroff and further stating that Allahabad
Bank had no claim against the Surs as the matter had been fully
and finally settled between the parties.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.