UNION OF INDIA Vs. MOUJI LAL SHAW
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
UNION OF INDIA (UOI)
MOUJI LAL SHAW
Referred Judgements :-
STANIFORTH V. LYALL
YATES V. WHYTE
BARROW V. ARNAUD
BRADBUM V. GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY
JEBSON V. EAST AND WEST INDIA DOCK CO.
RODOCANACHI V. MILBUM
WEST BENGAL V. MOHAN LAL JAIN
A.K.A.S.JAMAL V. MOOLA DAWOOD,SONS AND CO.
WILLIAMS BROTHERS V. AGIUS LTD.
GHATTURBHUJ VITHALDAS JASANI VS. MORESHWAR PARASHRAM
BENGAL NAGPUR RAILWAY CO LTD VS. RUTTANJI RAMJI
Click here to view full judgement.
Banerjee, J. -
(1.)This appeal, at the instance of the defendant Union of India, is directed against a decree for damages, amounting to Rs. 21,716/-, on account of non-delivery of goods.
(2.)Facts, as hereinafter stated, leading upto the sale of the goods, of which the delivery of the whole could not be given, are not disputed. Chewringhee Sales Bureau Ltd., (Defendant respondent No. 2) were auctioneers appointed by the Union Government and under express instructions from the Regional Commissioner (Disposals) (Ex. I(5) and I(4)) advertised for sale in public auction of 145 tons of Sal timber, as per conditions of sale contained in the notice (Ex. A). Thereafter, on 15-10-1046, the aforesaid goods were sold in auction at the workshop and store yard of Messrs. Indian Metal Corporation at 16, Belur Road, Howrah, where the goods were stacked and plaintiff Moujilal Shaw made the highest bid at Rs. 3,500/-, as the bid sheet (Ex. H) shows. He deposited a sum of Rs. 1000/- with the fall of the hammer and later on the same day, paid the balance of the price along with the sales tax. All these appear from the advance slip (Ex. 6) and the Cash Bill (Ex. 4). A delivery order on the stockist of the goods, Messrs. Indian Metal Corporation, the purport of which is contained in the plaintiff's letter, Ex. 1, directing the said Stockist that delivery must be given "by measurement (weight by weight) and a receipt obtained" was made over to the plaintiff.
(3.)The plaintiff, however, alleged that he could not take delivery, firstly, because the stock of timber sold, was found short by about 33 per cent and, secondly, because the stockist refused delivery. These will appear from letters marked Ex. 1(d) and I(a), respectively dated the 17th and the 21st October, 1946.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.