ANARALI TARAFDAR Vs. OMAR ALI
LAWS(CAL)-1950-8-4
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on August 11,1950

Anarali Tarafdar Appellant
VERSUS
>Omar Ali Respondents

JUDGEMENT

R.P.MOOKERJEE, J. - (1.) THE property in suit originally belonged to one Meher Ali Tarafdar. Before his death he bad executed a will on 15 -10 -1911. Although Meherali died in November following, probate was not obtained by his widow, Gour Bibi until 27 -6 -1935. By the will Meherali purported to create a life interest in favour of his widow Gour Bibi and after the determination of that life estate the property was to descend to all his legal heirs under the Mahomedan law. After having obtained probate Gour Bibi as executrix obtained permission from the Probate Court for sale of one of the properties which had been bequeathed by Meher Ali. After having obtained permission, Gour Bibi sold this particular plot to Wahed Hossain. The interest of Wahed Hossain was sold on 15 -5 -1940 in execution of a money decree obtained against him. The plaintiff Omar Ali was the purchaser and it is stated that he had obtained possession on 25 -6 -1941, through Court but as he could not get actual possession the present suit was start -ed in March 1944, for declaration of title and for delivery of possession.
(2.) MEHER Ali had three sons and one daughter. Defendants 1 to 6 are the heirs of Belat Ali, one of the sons of Meher Ali Defendant 6 is the widow of another son Asmat Ali. Another son, Entaz is dead as also his son Usuf. It is not possible to ascertain from the present record as to who the heirs of Usuf were but it appears that the parties had proceeded on the basis that Usuf's interest had vested in some or other of the defendants. Arifannessa, the only daughter of Meher Ali, had not been made a party. The defence in the main was that the will being of the entire property left by Meher Ali and the disposition being in favour of one or more of the heirs of the testator the will did not convey any title and the executrix had no right to deal with the property. There were other allegations that the kobala executed by Gour Bibi in favour of Wahed Hossain had not been acted upon and that the latter had never possessed the suit land. Both the Courts below have decreed the plaintiff's suit. The present appeal is on behalf of defendant 2 alone, one of the sons of Belat Ali.
(3.) UNDER the Mahomedan law, a Mahomedan cannot by will dispose of more than one -third of his estate unless such bequest in excess of the legal third is consented to by the heirs after the death of the testator.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.