MAYA RANI HEMBRAM (SAREN) Vs. KRISHNA SAREN
LAWS(CAL)-2020-12-16
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Decided on December 24,2020

Maya Rani Hembram (Saren) Appellant
VERSUS
Krishna Saren Respondents

JUDGEMENT

BIBEK CHAUDHURI,J. - (1.) This is an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the wife/petitioner praying for transfer of Matrimonial Suit No.814 of 2019 pending before the learned Additional District Judge (EC Court) at Paschim Medinipur to the Court of the learned District Judge, Bankura on the following grounds. (i) The petitioner after being driven out from her matrimonial home has been residing at her paternal home within the jurisdiction of the District Judge, Bankura. (ii) Distance of Bankura and Paschim Medinipur is about 126 kilometers. The petitioner will suffer inconvenience to make such journey of 126 kilometers in one way to contest the aforesaid matrimonial suit. (iii) The petitioner filed an application against the opposite party and other matrimonial relations under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and the said case is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 6th Court at Bankura. The opposite party is contesting the said criminal case filed against him and other matrimonial relations of the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner has also filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying for maintenance allowance for herself and her minor son aged about 7 years. The said Misc. Case being No.51 of 2017 is also pending in the 6th Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Bankura. (v) The respondent also filed Judicial Misc. Case being No.5 of 2018 under the Guardianship and Wards Act, 1819 (Act VIII, 1819) before the learned District Judge, Bankura.
(2.) Therefore, it is prayed by the petitioner that if the matrimonial suit is transferred to the Court of the learned District Judge, Paschim Medinipur, the opposite party will not suffer any inconvenience. On the contrary, it will be convenient for the petitioner to contest the said matrimonial suit before the learned District Judge, Bankura where another proceeding under the Guardianship and Wards Act is pending.
(3.) I have heard the learned advocate for the petitioner.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.