JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application is at the instance of the
defendants and is directed against the order no.58 dated December
21, 2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division),
First Court at Sealdah in Title Suit No.212 of 1997 thereby
passing orders for keeping the petition dated October 1, 2004
filed by the petitioners with the record.
(2.) The opposite party instituted a Title Suit being T. S. No.212
of 1997 for eviction of the defendants on the ground of default
and reasonable requirement. In that suit, the
defendants/petitioners appeared and filed a written statement.
The suit was at the stage of recording evidence. At that time,
the plaintiff tendered evidence of the P.W.1 by way of an
affidavit under Order 18 Rule 4 of the C.P.C. The
defendants/petitioners filed an application dated October 1, 2004
for expunction of certain portion of the evidence which was not
based on the plaint case. That application was not allowed by the
learned Trial Judge but he kept the same with the record for
consideration at the time of writing the judgment. Being
aggrieved, this application has been filed.
(3.) Mr. Halder, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the
applicant, submits that if the evidence is tendered by the
plaintiff by way of affidavits under Order 18 Rule 4 of the C.P.C.
and if it exceeds beyond the pleading of the plaintiff, it should
be expunged.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.