JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) A dispute has been sought to be raised as to the extent of the land enjoyed
by a cotton mill that was set up in the pre-Independence days and has only
recently stopped functioning altogether. Mahalaxmi Cotton Mills near Palta
Railway Station in North 24-Parganas was owned by a company of substantially
the same name. That company, Mahalaxmi Cotton Mills Ltd, was wound up in
1955 and its assets were put up for sale. In March, 1960 Gajraj Pannalal Ltd
purchased the assets and properties of Mahalaxmi Cotton Mills Ltd (in
liquidation). In 1972, the Central Government took over the cotton mill under the
Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. In 1974 the Sick Textile
Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act came into force and it was under such Act
that the said cotton mill and assets in relation thereto were taken over by the
Central Government and vested in the National Textile Corporation (NTC). Gajraj
Pannalal Ltd went into liquidation in 1972 within a few months of the cotton mill
and the assets in relation thereto having been taken over.
(2.) The applicant in three of the four applications is a contributory of Gajraj
Pannalal Ltd (in liquidation) and the principal issue raised in these proceedings
is that a piece of land measuring slightly over 4.25 acre that lay across a narrow
road from the mill compound was not, and could not have been, taken over by
the Central Government or NTC under either the 1951 Act or the 1974 Act and
the official liquidator should have taken possession thereof while presiding over
the liquidation of Gajraj Pannalal Ltd (in liquidation). Thirty-five years after all
assets in relation to the mill had been taken over by the Central Government and
it vested in the NTC, CA No. 232 of 2007 has been carried by the contributory
claiming that NTC had no authority to sell such land bearing original CS Dag
Nos. 1101-1108, 1133, 1134, 1137, 1138, 1140, 1143-1147 and 1152 at mouza
Palta in district North 24-Parganas. At the hearing, the applicant has relied on a
map that appears at page 173 of the affidavit in support of the summons and the
applicant has asserted the rights of the company (in liquidation) in respect of the
land covered by original CS Dag Nos. 1101-1105 and 1145-1147. The so-called
disputed land has been shaded and bordered in red at page 173 of the Court's
papers.
(3.) CA No. 231 of 2007 is an application seeking permanent stay of windingup
of Gajraj Pannalal Ltd (in liquidation) under Section 466 of the Companies
Act. CA No. 146 of 2009 is the third application by the contributory seeking the
appointment of a special officer to submit a report on the state of the land that
the applicant claims belongs to Gajraj Pannalal Ltd (in liquidation) and sought to
be wrongfully sold by NTC. Upon CA No. 232 of 2007 being received, an order
was made on March 30, 2007 permitting the sale of the entirety of the assets of
the cotton mill to be conducted by NTC on the reasoning that if the application
succeeded the sale proceeds of the relevant property could be directed to be made
over by NTC to the official liquidator who is the custodian of the properties and
credits of Gajraj Pannalal Ltd (in liquidation). The applicant says that an appeal
carried from such order was dismissed. The land in question has been purchased
by Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. CA No. 627 of 2009 is an application by the
successful purchaser seeking leave to intervene in these proceedings.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.