JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The concept of a foster child, that is, a foster son or a foster daughter is a fairly
new concept in Indian Jurisprudence. It is known from 1997, if not earlier.
(2.) In the case of K.V. Muthu v. Angamuthu Ammal, 1997 2 SCC 53, the Supreme Court has spoken about the rights of a foster child. A foster
child according to the Supreme Court decision is one, who has been received by
the foster parents at a very early stage of life, nurtured, cared and brought up as
their own child.
(3.) This is an application by a foster daughter of a deceased claiming revision of two
orders dated 05.06.2006 and 01.04.2008 passed by the learned Second Civil
Judge, Senior Division, Barasat refusing to add her as a party in a suit. The suit
is T.S. No. 51 of 2005 pending before the Barasat Court. It is a partition suit
amongst the heirs of Gopal Chandra Chakraborty, deceased. The petitioner
claiming to be a foster daughter of the deceased made an application for addition
as a party. Her claim was resisted by only one son of the said deceased, namely,
Anjan Chakraborty, respondent No. 1 herein. The other heirs of the deceased
being two sons and one daughter have not opposed her prayer for such addition.
It is true that the suit is of 2005. An earlier application was made on 8th August
2005 for the same purpose. When the application was taken up for hearing,
nobody appeared for the petitioner. However, the application was disposed of
refusing to add her as a party. This order was made on 5th June 2006. After and
about 1' years, the selfsame applicant made a second application. She argues
that because of her absence that order had not become res judicata. An order
was passed on 1st April 2008 in the second application to the same effect, that is,
dismissal of her application for addition of as party.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.