JUDGEMENT
Prasenjit Mandal, J. -
(1.) This application is at the instance of the
defendant and is directed against the order no.14 dated 06.07.2010
passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Eleventh Court,
Alipore, District South 24 Parganas on the two petitions filed
by the defendant/petitioner.
(2.) The short fact is that the plaintiffs/opposite parties filed
the Ejectment Suit No.305 of 2006 for eviction of the
defendant/petitioner from the suit property as described in the
schedule of the plaint on the ground of reasonable requirement and
default. In that suit, the defendant/petitioner appeared and filed
an application under Section 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises
Tenancy Act, 1997 and that application was disposed of. The
defendant/petitioner has complied with the order on his petition
and he is paying rent in respect of the suit property. The suit
was at the stage of peremptory hearing. The evidence of the P.W.1
was taken in part and his cross-examination was deferred on the
prayer of the defendant/tenant. In this way, more than three
months passed and several dates were fixed for hearing, but the
learned Trial Court failed to get the P.W.1 cross-examined by the
defendant/tenant. Ultimately on 16.04.2009, the learned Trial
Judge closed the cross-examination of the P.W.1 when the learned
lawyer for the defendant declined to cross-examine him.
(3.) Thereafter, the P.W.2 was examined on 30.04.2009. But on that day
too, the learned lawyer for the defendant refused to cross-examine
the P.W.2 and on 08.05.2009 the suit was fixed for further
examination for defence witness. On that day, the
defendant/tenant did not cooperate with the Court and ultimately,
the learned Trial Court fixed the next date on 18.05.2009 for
further hearing of the argument. Ultimately, the Court passed the
judgment on 10.09.2009. The defendant preferred an appeal against
the said judgment and at that appellate stage, the defendant filed
two petitions one for sending the suit back on remand to the court
below for cross-examination of the P.W.1 and giving evidence of
the defendant and another petition for granting the reasonable
time for bringing stay order from the Hon'ble Court. The learned
appellate court dismissed both the petitions by the impugned
order. Being aggrieved, this application has been filed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.