JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioner in this art.226 petition dated November 16,
2009 is seeking the following reliefs:
"(a) A writ of and/or in the nature of Mandamus commanding concerned
respondents, their men, agents, subordinates, representatives and/or assigns for
making arrangement for proper fair and impartial investigation into the
allegations forming the basis of the M.P. Case No.2792 of 2009 now pending and
being sent to I.C.-in-Charge, of Dum Dum P.S. under Section 144(2) of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the Court of learned Executive Magistrate,
Barrackpore, North 24-parganas; forthwith.
(b) A writ of and/or in the nature of Mandamus commanding concerned
respondents, their men agents, subordinates, representatives and/or assigns to
bring the private respondent herein being the accused of the case noted in Prayer
a as above forthwith.
(c) A writ of and/or in the nature of Mandamus commanding concerned
respondents, their men, agents, subordinates, representatives and/or assigns to
investigate all the pending case or cases against the private respondent to
establish the rule of law forthwith.
(d) A writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding to I.C., Dum Dum
P.S., to depute police personnel of the cost of the petitioner at premises No. 139,
Rafi Ahmed Kidwai Road, P.S.- Dum Dum, District North 24-Parganas
forthwith."
(2.) I am unable to see how the petitioner can get the reliefs from the high
court under art.226.
M.P. Case No.2792 of 2009 was registered on the basis of an application
filed under s.144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The order made in
the application cannot remain in force till today. It was made on September 15,
2009 (p.29). The Executive Magistrate directed the police to see that "the O.P.
members is not disturbed unlawfully in time of his lawful work in his lawful
possession." If the petitioner is apprehending that someone may dispossess him
of the property, in my opinion, his remedy, if any, is before the appropriate civil
court.
(3.) The opposite parties to the s.144 application cannot be treated as the
accused. Hence there is no question of getting any relief in terms of prayer (b). If
any case is pending in the sense that an FIR was registered by the police, and the
police are not investigating properly, then, in my opinion, the petitioners remedy,
if any, is before the criminal court that is supposed to monitor the investigation.
A vague order in terms of prayer (c) cannot be made so as to monitor a part of the
investigation in exercise of power under art.226.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.