JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioner herein being aggrieved by and dissatisfied
with the continuance of the order of suspension filed an
application before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal,
Calcutta Bench which was finally dismissed on merits by the
judgment and order dated 30th October, 2009.
(2.) The petitioner was initially appointed as Additional
Divisional Engineer, Telecom in the year 1984 and thereafter,
promoted to the post of Senior Administrative Grade and posted as
General Manager with effect from 16th December, 2002. The said
petitioner while working as General Manager, Kharagpur Telecom
District was placed under deemed suspension by the order dated 29th
December, 2008 under Rule 10(2) of the Central Civil Services
(Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1965 (hereinafter
referred to as "CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965") with effect from 19th
November, 2008.
(3.) The said suspension order was thereafter, reviewed and
extended for a further period of 180 days which was mentioned in
the order dated 26th March, 2009 issued by the Under Secretary to
the Government of India, Department of Telecommunications.
It has been urged on behalf of the petitioner that the
suspension order initially issued to the said petitioner was not
extended after review within a period of 90 days from the
effective date of suspension and, therefore, the subsequent
extension of the suspension order by the concerned authority
cannot be sustained in the eye of law in view of violation of the
specific provision of Rule 10(7) of the CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965.
For the purpose of effectively deciding the issues raised in
this appeal, the provisions of Rule 10(2), (5), (6) and (7) of
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules,
1965 are set out hereunder:
"10. Suspension.-(1)___________
(2) A Government Servant shall be deemed to have been placed
under suspension by an order of appointing authority,-
(a) with effect from the date of his detention, if he
is detained in custody, whether on a criminal
charge or otherwise, for a period exceeding fortyeight
hours;
(b) with effect from the date of his conviction, if,
in the event of a conviction for an offence, he is
sentenced to a term of imprisonment exceeding
forty-eight hours and is not forthwith dismissed
or removed or compulsorily retired consequent to
such conviction.
Explanation. - The period of forty-eight hours referred to in
clause (b) of this sub-rule shall be computed from the
commencement of the imprisonment after the conviction and for
this purpose, intermittent periods of imprisonment, if any,
shall be taken into account.
(3) * * * *
(4) * * * *
(5) (a) Subject to the provisions contained in sub-rule (7),
any order of suspension made or deemed to have been made under
this rule shall continue to remain in force until it is
modified or revoked by the authority competent to do so.
(b) Where a Government Servant is suspended or is deemed to
have been suspended (whether in connection with any
disciplinary proceeding or otherwise), and any other
disciplinary proceeding is commenced against him during the
continuance of that suspension, the authority competent to
place him under suspension may, for reasons to be recorded by
him in writing, direct that the Government Servant shall
continue to be under suspension until the termination of all
or any of such proceedings.
(c) An order of suspension made or deemed to have been made
under this rule may, at any time, be modified or revoked by
the authority which made or is deemed to have made the order
or by any authority to which that authority is subordinate.
(6) An order of suspension made or deemed to have been made
under this rule shall be reviewed by the authority which is
competent to modify or revoke the suspension [before expiry of
ninety days from the effective date of suspension] on the
recommendation of the Review Committee constituted for the
purpose and pass orders either extending or revoking the
suspension. Subsequent reviews shall be made before expiry of
the extended period of suspension. Extension of suspension
shall not be for a period exceeding one hundred and eighty
days at a time.
(7) An order of suspension made or deemed to have been made
under sub-rule (1) or (2) of this rule shall not be valid
after a period of ninety days unless it is extended after
review, for a further period before the expiry of ninety days.
Provided that no such review of suspension shall be necessary
in the case of deemed suspension under sub-rule (2), if the
Government servant continues to be under suspension at the
time of completion of ninety days of suspension and the ninety
days ' period in such case will count from the date of
Government servant detained in custody is released from
detention or the date on which the fact of his release from
detention is intimated to his appointing authority, whichever
is later.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.