JUDGEMENT
Shubhro Kamal Mukherjee, J. -
(1.) This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated June 19, 2000, passed by the learned District Judge at Barasat, District 24 Parganas (North) in Civil Revision case No. 30 of 2000 affirming the order No. 29 dated February 3, 2000, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Third court at Sealdah in Title Suit No. 426 of 1993.
(2.) The Plaintiff/Petitioner instituted Title Suit No. 426 of 1993, inter alia, for dissolution of partnership and for settlement of accounts. In the said suit the Defendant/ opposite party appeared and, thereafter, filed an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 praying for stay of the suit contending, inter alia, that one of the terms mentioned in the deed of partnership contained Arbitration Clause. The said Clause 14 of the deed of partnership runs as under:
"That in case of any dispute between the parties with regard to the interpretation of this deed or any other matter relating to the firms affairs, the some shall be referred to an Arbitrator mutually agreed upon between the parties in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act 1940 or may be modified from time to time or for the time being in force.
(3.) The learned Munsif after a contested hearing by Order No. 20 dated May 12, 1997, inter alia, passed an order granting stay of the suit.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.