- (1.)THE presence of the respondent No.10, the copetitioner with the appellants/petitioners before the writ court is not required to consider this appeal or any of the I.A. of the same. Consequently, the notice of I.A.No.1520/2015, appellant's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing the appeal is not required to such respondent No.10, hence, the same is deferred and dispensed with against such respondent.
(2.)HAVING heard the appellant's counsel on I.A.No.1520/15, the aforesaid application of the appellants for condoning the delay of 17 days in filing the present appeal, for the reasons stated in it, we are satisfied that sufficient cause is made out to condone the alleged delay, hence, by allowing the I.A., the same is condoned. Pursuant to it the appeal is taken up for admission.
(3.)APPELLANT 's counsel is heard.
The appellants have preferred this appeal under Section 2 (1) of M.P. Uchacha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyay Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 being aggrieved by the order dated 25.09.2014 passed by the writ court in W.P.No.644/2011 whereby the petition of the appellant as well as respondent No.10 filed for appropriate direction to the respondents/State authority not to register the false criminal cases against the petitioners with a further prayer to provide them the proper protection and security towards their lives and property alongwith the other other suitable relief has been dismissed as infructuous.