SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, J. - (1.)The applicant has filed this second application u/S. 439, Cr.P.C. for grant of bail. First application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dt.14/12/2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No.57718/2021.
(2.)The applicant has been arrested on 11/7/2021 by Police Station Gohalpur, District Jabalpur (M.P.), in connection with Crime No.844/2020 registered in relation to the offence punishable under Ss. 307, 294 of IPC and Sec. 25 of Arms Act.
Allegation against the applicant and other co-accused persons, in short, is that they assaulted the complainant Sourabh with knife due to which he received injuries. On the basis of the aforesaid, crime has been registered.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since11/7/2021. Charge sheet has been filed, therefore, no further custodial interrogation is required. The statement of injured Sourabh has been recorded, in which he has turned hostile and he stated that he has not seen anybody as to who beat him. Disposal of the matter will take long time. It is further submitted that the applicant cannot be kept in custody for an unlimited period without any substantial reason. The applicant is permanent resident of District Jabalpur (U.P.) and there is no likelihood of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence and he is ready to abide by the terms and conditions as may be imposed. With the aforesaid submissions, prayer for grant of bail is made out.

(3.)Learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State opposed the application contending that on the basis of the allegations and material available on record, no case for grant of bail is made out and prays for rejection of bail application.
However, it would not be desirable to enter into the merits of the rival contentions at this juncture. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that the trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre-trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000.00 (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court for his appearance on the dates given by the concerned Court.
5. The applicant shall also furnish a written undertaking before the concerned court that he will abide by the terms and conditions of various circulars, as well as, orders issued by the Central Government, State Government and local administration from time to time such as maintaining social distancing, physical distancing, hygiene etc. to avoid proliferation of Corona virus. 6.This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court tor to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4. The applicant shall not commit any other offence during pendency of the trial, failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically, without further reference to the Bench;

5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

A copy of this order be sent to the trial court concerned for compliance. Certified copy as per rules.