JUDGEMENT
SUJOY PAUL, J. -
(1.)In these batch of writ petitions, the petitioners are 'in-service candidates'. It is also not in dispute that being 'in-service candidates' petitioners have a
separate source of entry on 30% seats in Post Graduate Medical Courses.
(2.)The process of admission in the Post Graduate Courses are governed by statutory
Rules namely Madhya Pradesh Chikitsa Shiksha Pravesh Niyam, 2018 (Admission
Rules) made under Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik (Prevesh Ka Viniyaman Evam
Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007 (Adhiniyam). The petitioners/in-service
candidates in these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution have
prayed that seats falling under 30% reserved compartment earmarked for
'in-service candidates' the unfilled seats of SC/ST/OBC/EWS category cannot be
converted/shifted to the pool of open/direct category till they are first
offered to general/unreserved category candidates within the same
pool/compartment of 'in-service candidates' by exhausting the list in view of
combined reading of Rule 4 and Rule 14 of the Admission Rules.
Petitioners' contentions :-
(3.)Shri Siddharth Radhelal Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
W.P. No.5668/2022, 5940/2022 and 6229/2022 are exactly similar matters. In
these petitions, petitioners are general category candidates and their claim is
that if reserved category posts in their pool/compartment are not filled up,
same should go down to the petitioners in the same compartment. W.P.
Nos.6740/2022 and 6742/2022 are little different matters submits Shri Siddharth
Gupta, Advocate because petitioners of these petitions became eligible only in
mop-up round. If unfilled seats of same pool are not transferred to open/direct
category, the petitioners of these petitions may also get seats of their
entitlement.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.