JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)This revision is directed
against the order dated 25-10-1999 passed
by Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jabalpur
in criminal Case No.814 of 1999.
(2.)The non-applicant Ravikant Talwar
filed a complaint against the applicant
under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 (henceforth 'the Act').
The non-applicant alleged in his complaint
that he is the holder of power of attorney of
one Shri Shashikant Talwar. The applicant
and the complainant entered into two
agreements dated 8-5-1990 and 10-5-1992,
whereby the applicant was required to
construct building No. 183, A.P.R. Colony,
Katanga, Jabalpur. Pursuant to the aforesaid
agreements, it is alleged that the non-applicant
advanced Rs.2,70,000/- to the
applicant. It was agreed that the work of
construction of above mentioned house shall
be over by 30-8-1992. It is alleged in the
complaint that the applicant was not able to
deliver the completed building by 30-8-1992
and, therefore, the non-applicant agreed to
extend the time till 30-4-1993. It is alleged
in the complaint that pursuant to the aforesaid
agreements, three post-dated cheques dated
30-4-1993 were issued by the applicant in
favour of the non-applicant bearing
No.0646945 of Rs.30,000/-, No.0646946 of
Rs.30,000/- and No.064947 of Rs.40,000/-.
These cheques were in respect of the deposit
of the applicant in the Bank of India, Napier
Town Branch, Jabalpur. It is alleged that
after 30-4-1993, when the construction
was not completed, the non-applicant
presented the cheques to the Bank of India
on 5-5-1993. The Bank dishonoured the
cheques issued by the applicant with the
remarks that "Refer to Drawer Insufficient
Funds". The dishonoured cheques along with
the advice of the Bank were returned to the
non-applicant on 7-5-1993.
(3.)Thereafter, the non-applicant served
a notice dated 18-5-1993 to the applicant
under Section 138 of the Act which was
received by the applicant on 19-5-1993. In
the notice, a demand of Rs.1,00,000/-
(Rupees One Lakh) was made by the non-applicant.
On receiving no response from
the applicant, the non-applicant filed a
complaint under Section 138 of the Act on
18-6-1993 within the period of limitation
prescribed therefor.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.