JUDGEMENT
J.CHELAMESWAR, J. -
(1.) This writ petition is filed by six petitioners. All of them are members of
Mandal Praja Parishad of Gudur Mandal, Kurnool District. The second
respondent is the elected President of the said Mandal Praja Parishad. It
appears that the first three petitioners are originally members of the Telugu
Desam Party and got elected as candidates of the said party. The total strength
of the above mentioned Mandal Praja Parishad, is ten. One of the members
resigned and the consequential vacancy is not filled up by holding election.
In the result, there are nine members in the Mandal Praja Parishad at present,
whose total strength is ten.
(2.) It appears, on account of some differences between the first threepetitioners and the second respondent, the first three petitioners resigned from
the Telugu Desam Party. They along with the other three petitioners, sought
to move a 'No Confidence Motion' against the second respondent and the
same was taken up for consideration by the first respondent, who is the
competent authority under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat
Raj Act, 1994, on 5-1-1998. It appears, all the petitioners i.e., six in number
voted in favour of the 'No Confidence Motion'. The second respondent and
two others voted against the 'Motion'. It appears that the first respondent,
however, invalidated the votes of the first three petitioners herein, on the
ground that they voted against the 'whip' issued by the Telugu Desam Party
and consequently held that 'No Confidence Motion' was defeated.
(3.) Aggrieved by the said decision of the first respondent, the petitionersfiled Writ Petition No.735 of 1998 on the file of this Court. The matter was
heard by a learned single Judge of this Court and allowed the said W.P. by
a judgment dated 31-7-1998 following a Division Bench judgment of this Court
in Samala layaramaiah vs. Govrnment of Andhra Pradesh and others. The learned
single Judge held that the decision of the first respondent in invalidating the
votes of the first three petitioners is illegal and quashed the proceedings of
the first respondent herein dated 5-1-1998. After making the above mentioned
declaration, the learned singe Judge directed the first respondent to take
appropriate action, in accordance with the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh
Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.