JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Criminal Appeal No.1306 of 1999 was preferred by
A-1 and Criminal Appeal No.1364 of 1999
was preferred by A-2 in C.C. No.15 of
1996 on the file of the Special Judge for
C.B.I. Cases, Visakhapatnam. A-1 was
charged for the offences under Sections
120(B), 420, 468, 465, 471 and 477(A)
I.P.C. and Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with
13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,
1988 (for short 'the Act'). A-2 was charged
for the offences under Sections 120(B), 420
and 468 I.P.C. Both of them denied the
respective charges and claimed for trial.
(2.) The case of the prosecution is
briefly as follows:
A-1 worked as a Branch Manager and
A-2 as a temporary Sweeper, in Andhra
Bank, Nimmakuru Branch. During the year
1991-92, A-1 and A-2 entered into a criminal
conspiracy to cheat Andhra Bank and in
pursuance thereof, A-1 sanctioned and
disbursed eight loans in the names of non-
existing persons and misappropriated
Rs.85,000/- by drawing the amounts towards
loans in the names of non-existing persons.
A-1 falsified the loan documents in the
names of different persons. A-1 used the
forged documents as genuine and cheated
the Bank to a tune of Rs.85,000/-. A-1
abused his official position and obtained
fictitious loans himself. Since A-2 conspired
with A-1 in the commission of the offence,
both of them are punishable for the offences
mentioned in the respective charges.
Accordingly, after completing the investigation,
the police laid the charge-sheet.
(3.) The prosecution, in order to prove
the guilt of the appellants, examined PWs. 1
to 22 and marked Exs.P-1 to P-56. No oral
evidence was adduced on defence side, but
Ex.B-1 was marked.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.