JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The respondent/complainant
filed the Crl. M.P. No.6520 of 2002 to
vacate the interim stay granted by this
Court and with the consent of both the
parties, the Criminal Petition itself is being
disposed of.
(2.) The petitioner/accused filed this criminal petition under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for short
the Code' questioning the order of the
learned Principal Special Judge for SPE
& ACB Cases, Hyderabad, dated 3.5.2002
in Crl. M.P. No.123/2002 in C.C. No.40/1998.
(3.) The petitioner/accused filed the said petition before the aforesaid Court
under Section 293 of the Code read with
Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
praying the Court to send Ex.P.1 i.e., typed
application submitted by P.W.1 and others
to the District Co-operative Officer
seeking permission to start a Co-operative
Bank, and also Ex.D.1 typed 161 Cr.P.C.
statement of P.W.I recorded by P.W.6,
Deputy Superintendent of Police, A.C.B
to Handwriting Expert to compare both of
them and to say whether they were typed on
one and the same typewriter. The learned
Judge after considering all the aspects in
detail had ultimately arrived at a conclusion
that there are no grounds to send the
documents to an Expert and, accordingly,
the said petition was dismissed. Aggrieved
by the same, the petitioner/accused had
invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under
Section 482 of the Code.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.