JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application by the petitioner, under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, is to quash the order of the
Deputy Registrar (Marketing and Consumers) Hyderabad in his
Re. No. 1714/69-C, dated 8th January, 1970 disqualifying him from holding the office of a
member of the managing committee of
the Co-operative Marketing Society,
Tandur with effect from 1st May, 1969.
(2.) The petitioner is a member of the
Multipurpose Co-operative Society, Parwathapur on behalf of which he was sent
as a delegate to the Tandur Co-operative
Marketing Society Ltd., Tandur of which
he was elected as Vice-President in the
year 1968. By virtue of his being the
Vice-President of the Tandur Co-operative
Marketing Society, he was a member of
its committee. He was also a primary
member of the Tandur Go-operative Land
Mortgage Bank Ltd., Tandur in the years
1968-69 and still continues to be so. A
loan amounting to Rs. 394-93 due and
payable on 1st April, 1969 by the petitioner to the
Co-operative Land Mortgage Bank, Tandur was paid by him on
15th May, 1969. Clause (F) of by-law 33
of the by-laws of the Tandur Co-operative
Land Mortgage Bank Ltd., disqualifies
a person from being eligible for appointment as member of the Board of Directors
of the Bank if he is in default to the Bank
or to any other society in respect of any
loan or loans taken by him for a period
exceeding thirty days. The Deputy
Registrar (Marketing and Consumers)
Hyderabad, issued a notice to the petitioner on 10th October, 1969 to show
cause as to why he should not be disqualified from his directorship of the
Committee of the Co-operative Marketing
Society, Tandur on the ground that he
committed a default in repayment of
Rs. 394-93 to the Tandur Co-operative
Land Mortgage Bank for a period exceeding thirty days. In his reply dated 23rd
October, 1969, it was stated by the petitioner that no default in repayment of
any loan or amount either to the Cooperative Marketing Society of Tandur or
Parwathapur had been committed by
him, that the loan taken by him from the
Tandur Co-operative Land Mortgage
Bank was in his individual capacity but
not as a delegate of the Co-operative
Marketing Society, Parwathapur or
Tandur, that a director is not liable to be
disqualified if the period of default does
not exceed three months and that in any
event the impugned notice was illegal and
without jurisdiction as the amount was
in fact paid long prior to the issuance of
the show cause notice and hence he is
not liable to be disqualified. It was also
stated that he could not repay the amount
in question in time due to Telangana
Bundh agitation and did not commit any
deliberate default. The 2nd respondent
rejecting the pleas raised by the petitioner,
ultimately disqualified the petitioner by
passing the impugned order. Hence this
writ petition.
(3.) Reiterating the points already raised
by his client in his reply notice to the
Deputy Registrar, Sri Haridatta Reddy
argued that the impugned order is illegal
and without jurisdiction and in any event
the disqualification must be deemed to
have ceased by the date of the repayment
of the loan. This claim of the petitioner
is resisted by the Government pleader
contending inter alia that the order of the
Deputy Registrar is perfectly valid and
justified and the petitioner is disqualified
to continue as or to become a member of
the committee of any society till the end
of the life.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.