JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants in Criminal Application No. 3201 of 2019 and
Criminal Application No. 3160 of 2019. For the reasons stated
in the applications, the same are allowed in terms of prayer
clauses "B" respectively and disposed of accordingly.
(2.) The applicant - ARUN S/O. BHAUSAHEB PALANGE in anticipatory bail application no.1211 of 2019 and applicant -
CHANDARANI W/O. SACHIN SHINDE in anticipatory bail
application no. 1174 of 2019 are seeking pre-arrest bail in
connection with Crime No.293 of 2019 registered with
Tuljapur Police Station, District Osmanabad for the offences
punishable under Sections 498(A), 306 r/w 34 of IPC . Their
applications with similar prayer bearing Criminal Bail
Application Nos.298 of 2019 and 296 of 2019 came to be
rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Osmanabad, vide
orders dated 04.09.2019 and 27.08.2019.
(3.) Learned counsel for the applicants in both anticipatory bail applications submit that marriage of deceased
- Renuka with co-accused - Dashrath came to be solemnized
way back in the year 2006. The couple was also blessed with
two children and she was also taking care of one child of
earlier marriage of her husband. There are allegations to the
extent that the present applicants along with Dashrath were
insisting the deceased to give title documents pertaining to the
residential house for the purpose of availing loan for
construction of the house of applicant - Arun herein. They
wanted to mortgage the said residential house for availment of
loan for construction of the house of the applicant Arun herein.
It is further alleged in the complaint that deceased was not
ready and willing for the same and even she was not giving
the title documents to her husband and applicants herein.
to
abusing on that count. Though there are allegations about
suspecting the deceased for commission of theft of certain
amount, however, those allegations are restricted against co-
accused husband Dashrath who is arrested in connection with
the present crime. Learned counsel submits that no specific
instances have been quoted in the complaint about ill-
treatment being extended to the deceased. The applicant
Chandarani got married way back in the year 2006 and she is
residing with her husband. Learned counsel submits that only
on account of death of the deceased, other family members
also came to be falsely implicated in this crime. The applicants
may be released on anticipatory bail.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.