JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS Chamber Summons is taken out by the Plaintiffs praying that they be
permitted to amend the Plaint in terms of draft amendment as per the
Schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons.
(2.) THE Suit is filed by the Plaintiffs against the Defendants for specif-ic performance of an Agreement dated 20th December, 1974 entered
into between original Defendant No. 1 described as 'Vendors' and
Plaintiffs as 'Purchasers'.
It is the contention of the Plaintiffs that as per the said Agreement dated 20th December, 1974, the original Defendant No. 1 agreed to sell
the property at Carmichael Road (now known as M.L. Dhanukar Marg),
Bombay, consisting of a piece of land together with building standing
thereon known as, 'Villa Nirmala' having a ground floor and one upper
floor, together with garages and other structures thereon admeasuring
about 2665 sq.yds. equivalent to 2145.62 sq. meters. The consideration
agreed to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the original Defendant No. 1 was
Rs. 2,75,000/-. Out of this, the Plaintiffs claim to have paid Rs.
27,500/- as earnest or deposit money upon the execution of the said Agreement dated 20th December, 1974. The remaining amount of the purchase
money of Rs. 2,47,500/- was to be paid of completion of the sale as
provided under the said Agreement. The sale was to be completed within 60
days from the date of the agreement with liberty to either of the parties
thereafter to make time the essence of the contract by giving 15 days
notice in writing in that behalf to the other. The agreement also
contained various usual clauses. Clause 14 stated that if the sale could
not be completed due to any wilful delay or default on the part of the
Vendors, it would be lawful for the purchasers at their option to treat
the agreement as having been terminated by giving seven days notice in
writing in that behalf and claim the refund of the said deposit by way of
earnest money with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date thereof
till payment and all costs, charges and expenses of the Agreement along
with incidental charges or in the alternative, to file a Suit for the
specific performances and/or damages against the Vendors.
(3.) ACCORDING to the Plaintiffs' case, after execution of the above re-ferred agreement dated 20th December, 1974, some other steps like
lodging the said Agreement for registration with the Sub-Registrar of
Assurances at Bombay, giving public advertisements in the local news
papers, etc. were completed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.