JUDGEMENT
O.P.Garg, J. -
(1.) By means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the order dated
27.1.1999, Annexure-14, and the order dated 24.3.1999. Annexure-15 respectively passed by the
Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi respondent No. 2 and the District Judge, Varanasi
respondent No. 1 have been challenged. It is prayed that both these orders be quashed and the
respondents be directed not to interfere with the functioning of the duly elected body of U. P.
Olympic Association (for short 'U.P.O.A.') and its General Secretary, Sri Anandeshwar Pandey.
who are petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 respectively.
(2.) Sri R. N. Singh, learned Senior Advocate appeared on behalf of the respondent No. 3. He
stated that he would not file any counter affidavit and on the basis of material available with the
writ petition, it may be finally decided on merits. With the consent of learned counsel for the
parties, I proceed to decide this writ petition finally at the stage of admission according to the
Rules of Court.
(3.) Heard Sri V. B. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R. N. Singh. assisted by Sri
V. K. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 Mohd. Razauddin.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.