- (1.) MISC . Application dated 22-12-1997 filed under Sections 148, 149 and 151 Code of Civil Procedure has been put up for consideration along with the report dated 29-11-1993 of the Stamp Reporter. According to the Stamp Reporter stamp worth Rs. 95,877.50 paisa are deficit. The office note states that three months time was earlier granted to the appellant vide order dated 8-3-1995 to pay the deficit court-fee which has not been complied with.
(2.) THROUGH this miscellaneous application a prayer has been made to allow time to make good the deficiency in the Court-fee. Sri Mittal, learned counsel for the appellant, contended that the appellants are not at all in a position even by now to pay the deficit Court-fee but for the said reason the memorandum of appeal cannot be rejected rather it has to be returned as laid down by 5 Judges Full Bench in Wajid Ali v. Isar Banu, AIR 1951 Allahabad 64 (Paragraph 18).
(3.) THERE is no tangible material before us to satisfy as to why despite expiry of time of one year two months by now the appellants have not paid the deficit Court-fee. In view of the failure of the appellants to deposit the deficit Court-fee, and in view of the stand taken by Mr. Mittal that they are not in a position to pay the deficit court-fee, now being left with no option we reject this miscellaneous application.;