JUDGEMENT
I.M.Quddusi, J. -
(1.) Under Section 105 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [hereinafter referred to as
"Act"). It has been provided that no suit for infringement of a registered trade mark, or relating to
any right in a registered trade mark or for passing off arising out of the use by the defendant of
any trade mark which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' trade mark whether
registered or unregistered, shall be instituted in any Court inferior to a District Court having
jurisdiction to try the suit.
(2.) In this revision, a short question is involved as to whether the Court of Additional District
Judge can try and decide the suit instituted in the Court of District Judge and later on transferred
to it for trial and decision and whether the Court of Additional District Judge is an inferior Court
to a District Court. The "District Court" has been defined in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of
Section 2 of the Act. According to which, "District Court" has the meaning assigned to it in the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
(3.) I have heard Sri R. K. Jain, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Madho Jain for the
revisionist applicant and Sri R. P. Goel. learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Manish Goel for
the opposite parties at quite length.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.