SANTOSH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-1999-6-12
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on June 09,1999

SANTOSH KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) M. L. Singhal, J. I have heard the learned counsel for the accused-applicant and the learned A. G. A. for the State.
(2.) THE applicant Santosh Kumar has applied for bail under Sections 304-B and 498-A, IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The accused-applicant is the elder brother of the husband of the deceased. There are general allegations of demand of dowry against the accused-applicant also. The applicant has contended that he has been living separately. There is no evidence on record to show that he is living jointly with other member of the family. The accused-applicant deserves bail. The accused-applicant, Santosh Kumar, in Case Crime No. 97 of 1998, under Sections 498-A/304-B, I. P. C. and 3/4, Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Nabab-ganj, district Farrukhabad, shall be ad mitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judi cial Magistrate concerned. Bail granted. .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.