JUDGEMENT
SIDDHARTHA VARMA,J. -
(1.) This is a defendants' Second Appeal. The Suit as was filed by the plaintiff was dismissed. However, the Appellate Court
decreed the First Appeal. Hence the instant Second Appeal.
(2.) The suit was filed with an allegation that the plaintiff and the defendant had entered into a registered agreement to sell with
regard to half of the area of the plot no.940.
(3.) The Trial Court framed as many as six issues but since the finding with regard to Issue Nos.1, 3 and 4 was to the effect that
the execution of the agreement was not proved, it held that the
plaintiff was not entitled to get the sale executed in pursuance of
the document dated 13.10.1986. The Appellate Court, however,
reversed the judgment and specifically found that the document
dated 13.10.1986 was a registered agreement to sell and that the
plaintiff had proved the same in accordance with law and
thereafter decreed the suit.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.