JUDGEMENT
YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,J. -
(1.) Heard Sri Mohd. Nadeem, learned counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) The present petition has been filed making a prayer to set aside the judgment dated 28.10.2016 passed by the Judge Small
Causes Court/Civil Judge, Senior Division/Fast Track Court,
Farrukhabad in J.S.C.C. Suit No. 05 of 1982 (Mohammad Arif
and others Vs. Hanif) and also the judgment dated 29.10.2018
passed by the IIIrd Additional District Judge, Special Judge
(D.A.A.), Farrukhabad in S.C.C. Revision No. 03 of 2016
(Hanif Vs. Mohammad Arif and others).
(3.) The facts of the case indicate that the landlord-respondents had instituted a suit being S.C.C. Suit No.05 of 2007 against the
petitioner-tenant for eviction from the shop in question along
with claim for arrears of rent and mesne profit. The suit was
decreed in terms of the judgment dated 10.8.2007 with a finding
that U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 was not applicable to the premises
in question and it was also held that the petitioner-tenant was
liable to pay the rent at the rate of Rs. 200/- per month. Against
the aforesaid judgment dated 10.8.2007, the petitioner preferred
S.C.C. Revision No. 05 of 2007, which was allowed on
28.9.2013 and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that
while remanding the matter an observation had been made that
the trial court had erred in treating the rent to be at the rate of
Rs. 200/- per month.
Upon remand, the S.C.C Suit No. 05 of 1982 was partly
allowed vide judgment dated 28.10.2016 in so far as the relief
in respect of eviction of the petitioner-tenant and claim for
arrears of rent was concerned; however in respect of the rate of
rent, the trial court came to the conclusion that the rent was at
the rate of Rs. 100/- per month.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.