JUDGEMENT
SANGEETA CHANDRA,J. -
(1.) Heard Sri Shailendra Srivastava, who appears for the petitioner- Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sri Anurag Vikram
holding brief of Sri Dipak Seth for respondent no.2 and Sri
Vinayak Saxena for respondent no.3.
(2.) Sri Shailendra Srivastava, who appears for the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, has filed this petition on behalf
of the Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub Regional
Office, challenging the order passed by the Employees
Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi dated
19.9.2011.
(3.) Sri Anurag Vikram holding brief of Sri Dipak Seth, has pointed out the earlier order passed by this Court by which, the learned
counsel for the petitioner had to establish the maintainability of
the writ petition first.
Sri Vinayak Saxena is present for the SGPGI.
Learned counsel for respondent no.2 says that it is an exempted
company under sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the Employees
Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act as it is an
organization that employs ex-servicemen, who are in receipt of
pension benefits as admissible under the Government Rules
exclusively.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.