RAJEEV KUMAR Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
LAWS(ALL)-2019-12-50
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on December 11,2019

RAJEEV KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

AMRAWATI AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF U.P [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH V. GAURISHETTY MAHESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. MURAD ALI KHAN [REFERRED TO]
DHANALAKSHMI VS. R PRASANNA KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
POPULAR MUTHIAH VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
HAMIDA VS. RASHID ALIAS RASHEED [REFERRED TO]
MONICA KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM,J. - (1.)The applicants, by means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the entire proceedings as well as impugned summoning order dated 25.09.2019, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun in Complaint Case No. 811 of 2016, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Madhaugarh, District Jalaun, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, District Jalaun.
(2.)Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. representing the State.
(3.)Learned counsel for applicants argued that it is a counter blast case, filed under misuse of process of law because for an occurrence of 11.04.2016, which occurred at about 15 P.M., report was got lodged on 03.05.2016 for offences punishable under Sections 294, 452, 354, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. upon report of Rajiv Kumar against Ramsiya and Jitendra. Hence, this application with above prayer.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the application.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.