JUDGEMENT
Sanjay Kumar Singh, J. -
(1.) Heard Shri Sameer Jain, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Kunwar Rahul Ji, holding brief of Ms. Nandini Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 learned A.G.A. for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) This Criminal Revision under section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the revisionist Omkar Nath Singh, Rai Sahab Singh and Suraj Kumar Singh against the order dated 8.2.2017 passed by Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Varanasi in Complaint Case No.1098 of 2013 (Rakesh Kumar Singh vs. Omkar Nath Singh and others) under sections 406, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C, whereby the learned Magistrate dismissed the discharge application moved by the revisionists under section 245(2) Cr.P.C.
Basic facts
(3.) This case has a chequered history of litigations between the parties. Factual matrix of the case are that one agreement to sell (Satta-Ikrarnama) dated 3.5.1978 was executed by the revisionists in favour of Gopal Ji Singh (father of opposite party no.2) after taking an advance amount of Rs.20,000/- from Gopal Ji Singh in respect of 1/3 share of land araji No.290 area 06 decimel, 293/1 area 19-1/4 decimel, 468 area 28 decimel, araji No.546 area 5.66 decimel situated in village Bhagwanpur, Pargana Dehat, District Varanasi and 1/3 share of land araji No.558 area 0.42 decimal, 559 area 1-14 decimal, 626 area 48 decimel, 627 area 52 decimal, 632 area 39 decimal and 631 area 46 decimel land situated in village Chhitupur pargana Amanatpur, District Varanasi.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.