JUDGEMENT
SUDHIR AGARWAL,J -
(1.) HEARD Sri D.B. Mukharji for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel
representing respondents no. 1, 2, and 3
and Sri Jeevan Prakash Sharma for
respondent no. 4.
(2.) THE petitioner, already working as a Class IV employee in Neta Subhash
Krishi Sainik Inter College, Banki, Vinod
Nagar, Maharajganj (hereinafter referred
to as "College"), has filed the present writ
petition seeking the following reliefs :
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the Notice Dt. 01.11.2007 published in Daily News Paper ''Amar Ujala" by which Respondent No. 4 is going to direct recruit the promotion quota post of Asstt. Clerk of the Institution. (ii) To issue a Writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus directing to Respondent No. 2 and 3 to promote the petitioner as Asstt. Clerk in the Institution, as he is only Class-IV employees who has requisite qualification for the post of Asstt. Clerk. (iii) To issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (iv) To award costs of the Writ Petition to the Petitioner against the Respondents."
The case of the petitioner is that there are four sanctioned posts of Class
III, i.e., three posts of Clerk and one post
of Head Clerk in the College out of which
one post (Head Clerk) is already occupied
by one Sri Hira Lal, promoted from the
post of Clerk and another post of Clerk is
occupied by Sri Surendra Lal Srivastava,
a Class-IV employee promoted in
promotion quota to Class III post.
Another post, which fell vacant, he
contended, in view of Regulation 2
Chapter III of the Regulations framed
under U.P. Intermediate Education Act,
1921 ought to have been filled in by promotion inasmuch for the purpose of
determining promotion quota, the post of
Head Clerk has to be excluded and there
being only three posts of Clerk, 50% have
to be filled in by promotion. Since 50% of
3 posts of Clerk comes to 1.5 and fraction will go for promotion, therefore, two
posts of Clerk have to be filled in by
promotion and one by direct recruitment.
(3.) IN the case in hand, the respondents have decided to fill in the
post in question by direct recruitment and
that too keeping it reserved for Other
Backward Classes (in short "OBC"). Sri
D.B. Mukharji submits that the
advertisement published by respondent
no. 4 for filling in the post in question by
direct recruitment is illegal. He further
submitted that in any case, the post of
Clerk sought to be filled in by direct
recruitment, cannot not be kept reserved
for OBC as that would exceed the quota
of reservation prescribed for OBC which
is only 27% under U.P. Public Services
(Reservation for Scheduled Castes,
Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward
Classes) Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to
as "1994 Act").;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.