JUDGEMENT
A.P.SAHI, J. -
(1.) THE prayer made is to consider the representation dated 05.10.2009 which
has been filed before the District
Inspector of Schools praying for release
of certain benefits of the petitioner. The
petitioner claims that he retired as a
Class-IV employee on 31.07.2007 and,
therefore, he is entitled to his retiral
benefits.
(2.) THE petitioner, while in service, was convicted in a criminal case. The said
conviction has been questioned by the
petitioner in a criminal appeal before this
Court which has been admitted on 03.08.2007 and the execution of sentence
as against the petitioner has been
suspended.
On the strength of the aforesaid position, learned counsel for the petitioner
contends that the petitioner was merely
impleaded in a criminal case and once the
sentence has been suspended by this
Court, the natural legal consequence is
that the petitioner should be presumed to
be an innocent person and all his benefits
should be released.
(3.) THE position in law is that there is no power conferred under Section 389 of
the Criminal Procedure Code to stay the
conviction itself and it is only the
execution of the sentence which can be
suspended. The order dated 03.08.2007, a
copy whereof is annexure 2 to the writ
petition, is inconsonance with the
provisions of Section 389 Cr.P.C.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.