JUDGEMENT
A.P.SAHI,J. -
(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing
counsel for the respondents. The
proceedings arise out of orders passed
under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on
Land Holdings Act, 1961 (hereinafter
referred to as 'the Act').
(2.) THE present writ petition has been preferred against the order dated
1992 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Jhansi
Division, Jhansi, whereby the appeal filed
on behalf of the State, questioning the
order of the Prescribed Authority dated
25.10.1991, has been allowed and the land to the tune of 9.84 acres in the
irrigated sense has been declared as
surplus in the hands of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the order is erroneous,
inasmuch as, the order dated 25th May,
1978 passed by the Prescribed Authority, whereby only an area of 1.24 acres has
been declared surplus, had become final
and there was no further land available so
as to reopen the entire proceedings on the
principles of Section 38-B of the Act,
1960 . Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the proceedings were not
ex-parte and had been decided upon an
order of remand having been passed by
the then Appellate Authority on two
specific issues. It is urged that the
impugned order incorrectly without
appreciating the facts on record on the
issue of ex-parte proceedings has caused
prejudice. The Appellate Authority has
proceeded to reopen the entire case,
which was impermissible in law. He
contends that the declaration of the land
as surplus in the hands of the petitioner
has attained finality and, therefore, the
authority could not have exceeded its
jurisdiction by restoring an order which
had already been set aside and had been
finalized by the Prescribed Authority on
25.05.1978.
(3.) LEARNED standing counsel, on the other hand, contends that, as a matter of
fact, the order dated 25.05.1978 was exparte
and had proceeded on an incorrect
assumption and, therefore, the Additional
Commissioner was justified in reopening
and rehearing the entire matter and restore
the earlier order of the Prescribed
Authority passed in the year 1976.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.