JUDGEMENT
Hon'ble B.K.Narayana, J. -
(1.) Heard Sri Amarjit Singh learned counsel for
the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
(2.) Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged. With the consent of
learned counsel for the parties this writ petition is being finally disposed of at this
stage.
(3.) The petitioner was granted a licence for running a fair price shop in Village
Gokalpur, Block Puwaraka District Saharanpur. The aforesaid licence was
cancelled by the respondent No. 3 by order dated 7.7.2007 (Annexure No. 2 to
this writ petition) inter alia on the grounds that there were complaints of irregularities
in the distribution of scheduled commodities and black marketing against the
petitioner and upon his son being elected as Pradhan of the Gram Sabha in which
the petitioner's fair price shop exists he had became disqualified to run his fair
price shop in view of the restriction imposed in the Government Order dated
18.7.2002. The petitioner challenged the order dated 7.7.2007 by preferring an
appeal under paragraph No. 28 of the U.P. Essential Commodities Distribution
Order 2004 before the respondent No. 2 which was registered as appeal No. 67 of
2006-07, inter alia on the grounds that the licensing authority erred in cancelling
the petitioner's fair price shop agreement merely on the basis of complaints of
irregularities in the distribution of essential commodities against the petitioner
without recording any finding that the allegations made against the petitioner
stood proved on the basis of any evidence on record; that the licensing authority
did not consider the explanation submitted by him in reply to the charge-sheet in
accordance with law; that the petitioner's fair price shop agreement was not liable
to be cancelled by invoking the government order dated 18.7.2002 which is
prospective in nature as the disqualification stipulated therein could not have
been applied retrospectively for cancelling the petitioner's fair price shop licence
on the ground of his son having been elected as Pradhan and also for the reason
that he had disowned his son in the year 2000;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.